PHI (1.618), The perfect ratio
Reading Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code reminded me of that 'perfect' number. A few years back I remembered watching a documentary on Discovery channel on the theory behind a beautiful face. What's the theory? PHI.
In Da Vincci Code, Dan gave a few examples. If you measure from the top of your head to your belly button (A), and then from your belly button to your toes (B), you will find B is 0.618% longer than A. You can try measuring your arm too, from the shoulders to the elbow, elbow to the tip of your fingers.
So how does this apply to the face? Well it's hard to explain it in text so you will have to see some pictures. According to the documentary, when measuring the distances and gaps on the face (or the human body I presume) the more 1.618 ratio makes one more beautiful. It's weird when you put beauty on scales... you'll get 1.618. Then again it's not all about PHI.
According to a research done, the more symmetric a person is, the more attractive the person. There's a bit of truth in that actually. Just imagine a normal face, and one with one eye larger than the other. The one with the symmetric face would be more attractive.
The documentary also interviewed a plastic surgeon who use this PHI theory to actually 'redesign' faces. The more symmetric and the more PHI'ish the better. He also took Tom Cruise and Liz Hurley's picture and drew all the PHI lines all over them; it does show that their eyes, noses and mouths are all on\almost on the PHI lines.
There are more interesting facts for you to discover in Da Vinci Code. Go read the book. If you think it's some boring book about art and science, well I bet you my next pay cheque that it is not. Suspense gila! I love the book! Rating 9\10
9 Comments:
i've read the da vinci code, but sadly it was not what i expected. probably it's because i'm not an avid fan of dan brown, or maybe this isn't my type of genre. the opening is thrilling and exciting, but the suspense goes downward from there. his research on the paintings and stuffs are fantastic, it drew me to search for related infos in the net, but i found most of them are somewhat exaggerated. but that's just my point of view, i'm very hard to please, hahahaha...
btw, the phi thing is an incredible theory. dan brown really impressed me with his detailed elaboration.
most of the stuff are fictional not facts
Livingmonolith: Hm.. actually I somewhat agree with you. The almost ending chapters were anti-climax...maybe because the identity of the Teacher was revealed already.
Hehehe I did some research myself too, I found what real historian and artist though about the book.
sca1lyway: Hm… but a lot of facts for a fiction book.
yep..dan brown's a legend :) try deception point...full of facts
Strange that you should mention Da Vinci Code, Angels and Devils all at the same time. haha... I just accompanied my cousin brother to purchase these titles. Will get my hands on them as soon as he's done with them... err... gonna have to wait a long time though.
My opinion on why he declares them as fiction whilst backed up with so many real life facts... I guess he's speaking on his own terms, findings... yet he does not speak on everyone's behalf... therefore fictions they are.
Sean--
WaiKean: Hehehe can't be reading all his books at onces. I'm going to read angles and demon first, then deception point, then digital fortress! muahahha
sean: Eh I'm done with da vinci code. you can take it for your long holiday across the sea if you want. Can pass it to you.
Ei thanks lots Chian! =D hehe... well, me will give you a call this 2 days lar if coming to get. Thanks ya!!! =D
Nuts... forgot the name again... it's me Sean.
what the ratio for happiness
http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~poubae
Post a Comment
<< Home